Urinary Concentrations of Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid and Related Compounds in Pregnancy

Guttorm Raknes, Lena Aronsen, and Ole Martin Fuskevåg
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of North Norway Trust, NO-9038 Tromsø, Norway

Endogenous production complicates the interpretation when gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is measured in urine for forensic purposes. We performed a cross-sectional study to test the hypothesis that pregnant women have higher levels of urinary GHB than non-pregnant controls, and thus increased risk of false-positive GHB tests. GHB, gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) and beta-hydroxybutyric acid (BHB) concentrations in urine from 66 pregnant women and 69 non-pregnant controls were analyzed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS–MS). The mean GHB, GBL, and BHB concentrations were 0.36, 0.34 and 1.92 mg/L in the pregnant women, and 0.24, 0.08 and 0.40 mg/L in the control group. The pregnant women had significantly higher levels of GHB (1.5-fold), GBL (4.3-fold) and BHB (4.8-fold). Creatinine-adjusted GHB concentrations were similar in both groups. Pregnant women have higher urinary levels of GHB, GBL, and BHB. In LC–MS–MS assays not distinguishing between GHB and BHB, there is a significantly increased risk of false-positive GHB tests in pregnant women. This false-positive rate can be reduced by correcting for creatinine concentration, by using GHB-specific assays or by introducing higher interpretative cut-off levels for pregnant women in assays that do not discriminate between GHB and GBL or BHB.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

September 2010

Customer Reviews:

You may also be interested in this/these product(s)

Journal of Analytical Toxicology: September 2010 $90.00