About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JAT

 Randox

Recommend JAT to your librarian

 


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 32, Number 1, January/February, pp.106-115

A Rapid, Cost-Effective Method for Analyzing Organophosphorus Pesticide Metabolites in Human Urine for Counter-Terrorism Response
Gayanga Weerasekera[1], Kimberly D. Smith[2], Larry L. Needham[1], and Dana B. Barr[1],
[1]Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy. NE, Mailstop F-17, Atlanta, Georgia 30341 and
[2]Battelle Memorial Institute, Bel Air, Maryland

Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides are used as insecticides in agriculture and pest control and are often called “junior strength” nerve agents because they share the same mechanism of toxicity. OP pesticides are metabolized to dialkylphosphates and other metabolites, which are excreted in urine. In case of a terrorism incident involving widely available OP pesticides, an occurrence that may be likely given their widespread availability, a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective method for detecting exposure is required. We have evaluated several analytical methods to determine the most reliable and cost-effective methods for incident response. Our comparisons have included different internal standards (isotopically labeled standards versus chemically similar surrogate standards), different isolation techniques (some of which are automatable), and different analysis platforms. We found that isotopically labeled standards were a necessity to provide accurate quantification; the chemically similar surrogate was not suitable as an internal standard. The most sensitive and precise method uses isotopically labeled standards with gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis. However, the most cost-effective method employed isotopically labeled standards with gas chromatography–single quadrupole-mass spectrometry using a less expensive mass selective detector. Because this method is lower in cost, it may be a more viable option for equipping multiple laboratories with chemical-terrorism response capabilities.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $4.00 per page.
Visa or MasterCard accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |