About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 30, Issue 4, May 2006, pp.225-231

Urinary Excretion of Morphine and Codeine Following the Administration of Single and Multiple Doses of Opium Preparations Prescribed in Taiwan as “Brown Mixture”
Hsiu-Chuan Liu[1,2], Hsiu-O Ho[2], Ray H. Liu[3], Geng-Cheng Yeh[4], and Dong-Liang Lin[1,5],
[1]Department of Forensic Toxicology, Institute of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice, Taipei, Taiwan;
[2]Graduate Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan;
[3]Department of Medical Technology, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung Hsien, Taiwan;
[4]Department of Pediatrics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; and
[5]Department of Medical Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Parallel to the “poppy-seed defense” strategy commonly reported in the United States, donors of urine samples tested positive for opiates in Taiwan often claimed the consumption of Brown Mixture (BM) as the source of the observed morphine and codeine. Because BM contains opium powder (10.0–10.5% morphine), opium tincture (0.9–1.1% morphine), or camphorated opium tincture (0.045–0.055% morphine) and is a popular remedy, and heroin use is considered a serious criminal act, the claim of BM use has to be adequately addressed. In this study, BM from seven different manufacturers (5 tablets and 2 solutions) and urine samples from alleged heroin users and volunteers with various ingestion patterns and were analyzed for their morphine and codeine contents. The analytical procedure included hydrolysis, trimethylsilylation, and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis. The contents of morphine and codeine in the tablets were found to be very consistent, but with significant differences in the two BM solutions. Morphine concentrations found in urine specimens collected from volunteers ingesting BM tablets (or solutions) were always < 4000 ng/mL. The following morphine-to-codeine ([M]/[C]) ratios were observed for urine specimens with morphine concentration ≥ 300 ng/mL: (A) < 3.0 for volunteers ingesting BM solution and (B) > 3.0 (mostly > 5.0) for volunteers ingesting BM tablets and alleged heroin users. It appeared that (A) BM ingestion (tablet or solution) was unlikely to result in a morphine concentration > 4000 ng/mL; and (B) [M]/[C] ratio might not be an effective parameter to differentiate heroin use from BM tablet ingestion.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |