About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 30, Issue 3, April 2006, pp. 178-186

Quantitation of Cotinine in Nonsmoker Saliva Using Chip-Based Nanoelectrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Bruce A. Tomkins[1,2], Gary J. Van Berkel[1,2], Roger A. Jenkins[2], and Richard W. Counts[3]
[1]Organic and Biological Mass Spectrometry Group,
[2]Chemical Sciences Division,
[3]Statistics and Data Sciences Group, Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6120

A new analytical procedure was developed for the quantitation of nonsmoker salivary cotinine. Small volumes of saliva were diluted with water, fortified with cotinine-d3 (internal standard), then passed through small extraction columns. The analyte and internal standard were eluted with 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid/acetonitrile. Aliquots of each extract were analyzed directly, without chromatographic separation, using chip-based (NanoMate™) nanospray tandem mass spectrometry. The calculated detection limit was 0.49 ng cotinine/mL saliva. This method was used to quantify salivary cotinine collected from nonsmoking human subjects living in one of three environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure categories or “cells”: 1. smoking home/smoking workplace; 2. smoking home/nonsmoking workplace; and 3. nonsmoking home/smoking workplace. Samples were collected during five sequential days, including Saturday, as part of a larger study to evaluate potential variability in exposure to ETS. Salivary cotinine measurements were made for the purpose of excluding misclassified smokers and for comparison with known levels of exposure to airborne nicotine in each exposure category. The concentrations observed were consistent with those reported from other large studies reported elsewhere. A non-parametric statistical test was applied to the data within each cell. No statistically significant differences were found between the mean cotinine concentrations collected on a weekday as compared to those collected on a weekend day. When the non-parametric test was applied to the three cells, a statistically significant difference was observed between cell 1 compared to cells 2 and 3. The salivary cotinine concentrations were thus statistically invariant over a five-day exposure period, and they were greatest under the conditions of smoking home and smoking workplace.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |