About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 27, Number 6, September, pp. 332-341

Methadone and Metabolite Urine Concentrations in Patients Maintained on Methadone
Kenzie L. Preston[1], David H. Epstein[1], David Davoudzadeh[2], and Marilyn A. Huestis[1]
[1]Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Research Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland 21224 and
[2]Microgenics Corporation, Fremont, California 94538

As regulatory control over methadone maintenance relaxes, the need for methods of monitoring compliance will increase. In community clinics, monitoring would most likely involve immunoassays of outpatients’ trough urine specimens. There are no published norms for such data. Therefore, we determined concentrations of methadone in 1093 urine specimens collected thrice weekly in 27 outpatients during up to 17 weeks of observed methadone ingestion (35 to 80 mg/day) using a semiquantitative homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (CEDIA). We used a separate CEDIA assay to measure methadone’s main metabolite, 2-ethylidene-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), which may help detect compliance in fast metabolizers or patients who adulterate samples to simulate compliance. Methadone concentrations were more variable than those of EDDP. Concentrations of methadone were < 100 ng/mL in one specimen, between 100 and 300 ng/mL in 27, and ≥ 300 ng/mL in all others. EDPP concentrations were ≥ 100 ng/mL in all specimens, suggesting that EDDP should be detectable in urine from compliant patients. Methadone and EDDP concentrations significantly increased with methadone dose and (in one participant with poor clinic attendance) significantly decreased following missed methadone doses. Nevertheless, variability was too great to permit estimation of methadone dose (or detect a single missed administration) from any single specimen.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |