About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 27, Number 7, October 2003, pp. 407-411

Cozart® RapiScan Oral Fluid Drug Testing System: An Evaluation of Sensitivity, Specificity, and Efficiency for Cocaine Detection Compared with ELISA and GC–MS Following Controlled Cocaine Administration
Erin A. Kolbrich[1], Insook Kim[1], Allan J. Barnes[1], Eric T. Moolchan[1], Lisa Wilson[2], Gail A. Cooper[2], Claire Reid[2], Dene Baldwin[2], Chris W. Hand[2], and Marilyn A. Huestis[1]
[1]Chemistry and Drug Metabolism Section, Intramural Research Program, NIDA, NIH, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, Maryland 21224 and
[2]Cozart Bioscience, Ltd., 45 Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4RU, United Kingdom

Oral fluid has become a widely accepted alternative matrix for drugs of abuse detection. Immunoassays have been developed for on-site testing of cocaine and metabolites in oral fluid. The performance of the Cozart RapiScan Oral Fluid Drug Testing System (CRS) was evaluated in comparison with Cozart Microplate Enzyme Immunoassay Cocaine Oral Fluid Kit (COC ELISA) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) at several screening and confirmation cutoffs, including those proposed by SAMHSA and those currently in use in the U.K. Oral fluid samples (n = 1271) were collected prior to and following controlled clinical cocaine administration. CRS provides a qualitative screen at a preset cutoff of 30 µg/L. Sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency for CRS (30 µg/L) as compared with COC ELISA with a cutoff of 30 µg/L were 92.1%, 91.8%, and 92.0%. The comparison of CRS (30 µg/L) with the 8-mg/L proposed SAMHSA confirmation cutoffs for cocaine and/or benzoylecgonine exhibited a sensitivity of 82.7%, a specificity of 94.5%, and an efficiency of 87.6%. For this study, an alternative CRS cutoff of 20 µg/L was also evaluated. Performance characteristics of CRS (20 µg/L) at the proposed SAMHSA confirmation cutoffs were 89.9%, 89.7%, and 89.8%, respectively. At cutoffs in use in the U.K., 30-µg/L CRS screen and 15-µg/L GC–MS cutoffs for cocaine, benzoylecgonine, and/or ecgonine methyl ester sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency were 89.4%, 92.2%, and 90.7%, respectively. Cozart RapiScan had performance similar to the COC ELISA assay for the detection of cocaine exposure and suitable sensitivity and specificity at the proposed SAMHSA cutoffs.

 

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |