About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 27, Number 3, April 2003, pp. 156-161

TECHNICAL NOTE: 1H NMR Spectroscopy and GC–MS Analysis of a-Chloralose. Application to Two Poisoning Cases
Sandrine Savin[1], Bernard Cartigny[1], Nathalie Azaroual[2], Luc Humbert[1], Michel Imbenotte[3], Djamel Tsouria[4], Gaston Vermeersch[2], and Michel Lhermitte[1],[3]
[1]Laboratoire de Biochimie et Biologie Moléculaire, Hôpital Albert Calmette, Lille, France;
[2]Laboratoire de Physique, UPRESA CNRS 8009, Laboratoire d’Application RMN de l’Université de Lille 2, Lille, France;
[3]Laboratoire de Toxicologie, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Lille, France; and
[4]Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Provo, Roubaix, France

a-Chloralose, a compound widely used as a rodenticide and in the control of bird pests, is readily available. Two cases of intentional poisoning are reported. Both patients became comatose and presented hypersialorrhea and myoclonal crises in the legs. They were discharged from hospital after several days. As clinical signs of a-chloralose poisoning lack specificity, anamnesis might be difficult, particularly in the case of delayed diagnosis. Toxicological analysis is therefore critical, and this article reports the investigation of serum and urine samples by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) in the electron-impact mode, and by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) spectroscopy. Non-hydrolyzed urinary samples and those hydrolyzed by b-glucuronidase were taken into consideration. After acetylation, GC–MS analysis was based on characteristic mass-to-charge ratio values of 272 for a-chloralose and 206 for b-hydroxyethyltheophylline, which was used as internal standard. Characterization of a-chloralose species by 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed taking two parameters into account: chemical shift and coupling-constant values. Without any pretreatment, 1H NMR spectroscopy revealed the presence of free (5.50 and 6.15 ppm) and conjugated forms of a-chloralose by characteristic resonances of H1 and chloral-type protons, respectively. Quantitative analysis was performed by relative integration of peak areas. Serum a-chloralose showed concentrations below the quantitation limit of both methods. In urine samples, the free chemical species rapidly decreased. GC–MS analysis revealed the predominence of conjugation after a b-glucuronidase hydrolysis step. 1H NMR analysis directly showed that on admission of the first patient, average urinary concentrations were 1.73 mmol/L (535 mg/L) for the free form and 13.72 and 6.25 mmol/L for the two conjugated forms. A later enzymatic treatment confirmed the total concentration of a-chloralose chemical species. Analysis of a-chloralose in urine by either GC–MS or 1H NMR spectroscopy methods proved to be comparable.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |