About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 26, Number 7, October 2002, pp. 500-503

An Evaluation of the OnTrak Testcup®-er On-Site Urine Drug-Testing Device for Drugs Commonly Encountered from Emergency Departments
Michelle R. Peace[1], Justin L. Poklis[1], Lisa D. Tarnai[2], and Alphonse Poklis[1]
[1]Department of Pathology, Medical College of Virginia Campus at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0165
[2]Scientific Testing Laboratories, Inc., Richmond, Virginia 23236

We evaluated the performance of the Roche OnTrak Testcup-er (TC-er), an on-site drug-testing device, for the detection of amphetamines (AMP), barbiturates (BRB), benzodiazepines (BNZ), benzoylecgonine (BE), and opiates (OPI) in urine specimens from hospital emergency departments. This device utilizes a competitive binding microparticle immunoassay to simultaneously determine the presence of the following drugs or drug classes in urine at and above the following cut-off concentrations: AMP, 1000 ng/mL; BRB, 200 ng/mL; BNZ 200 ng/mL; BE, 300 ng/mL; and OPI, 300 ng/mL. One hundred forty-nine urine specimens received from emergency departments were simultaneously tested by the EMIT® II monoclonal immunoassay (Emit) and TC-er. Specimens yielding discordant results were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. There was a 98% (146/149) agreement of results between the methods for the presence or absence of drugs. TC-er yielded 110 positive drug findings in 79 specimens, and Emit yielded 102 positive drug findings in 76 specimens. There was a 97% agreement between the methods for positive findings of at least one drug. The majority of discordant results were due to variations in selectivity of the assays for phenobarbital and BNZ metabolites. TC-er yielded a single false-positive result for amphetamines, and barbiturates, possibly three false-positive benzodiazepine results, and a single false-negative opiate finding. This represented four certain errors out of 745 total results, or a 0.4% error rate. If the three false-positive BNZ results were also considered, the error rate would be 0.9%. TC-er demonstrated acceptable linearity around the cut-off concentration of each drug. The TC-er was determined to be a reliable device for rapid on-site testing of emergency department urine specimens.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |