About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 26, Number 3, April, pp. 253-261

Rapid Simultaneous Determination of Amphetamine, Methamphetamine, 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine, 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and 3,4-Methylenedioxyethylamphetamine in Urine by Solid-Phase Extraction and GC–MS: A Method Optimized for High-Volume Laboratories
Peter R. Stout, Carl K. Horn, and Kevin L. Klette
Navy Drug Screening Laboratory, P.O. Box 113, Bldg. H-2033, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida 32212

To facilitate analysis of high sample volumes, an extraction, derivatization and gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric analysis method was developed to simultaneously determine amphetamine (AMP), methamphetamine (MAMP), 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) in urine. This method utilized a positive-pressure manifold cation-exchange polymer-based solid-phase extraction followed by elution directly into automated liquid sampler (ALS) vials. Rapid derivatization was accomplished using heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA). Recoveries averaged 90% or greater for each of the compounds. Limits of detection were 62.5 ng/mL (AMP and MDEA), 15.6 ng/mL (MAMP), and 31.3 ng/mL (MDA and MDMA) using a 2-mL sample volume. The method was linear to 5000 ng/mL for all compounds using MDMA-d5 and MAMP-d14 as internal standards. Over 200 human urine samples previously determined to contain the target analytes were analyzed using the method. Excellent agreement was seen with previous quantitations. The method was challenged with 75 potentially interfering compounds and no interferences were seen. These interfering compounds included ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, and phenethylamine. The method resulted in dramatic reductions in processing time and waste production.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $4.00 per page.
Visa or MasterCard accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |