About Us
Author Guidelines
Contact Us
Supplier Info
 


Current Issue
Sample issue of JATCurrent Issue


Contact Info:
6600 W. Touhy Ave.
Niles, IL 60714
Tel: 847.647.2900
Fax: 847.647.1155
circulation@jatox.com

 

 
   

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, ISSN 0146-4760, Volume 26, Number 1, January/February 2002, pp. 58

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: High Concentrations of Chloroquine in Urine Gives Positive Result with Amphetamine CEDIA Reagent
C. Lora-Tamayo, T. Tena, A. Rodríguez, and D. Moreno
Instituto Nacional de Toxicología Ministerio de Justicia Luis Cabrera, 9 28002 Madrid Spain

To the Editor:
During the development of a routine workplace drug testing of urine with CEDIA Amphetamine reagent, two urines with a positive result were found. One result was clearly above the established cutoff (586 vs. 500), and the other was slightly below the cutoff (494 vs. 500). We proceeded to extract the urines (2 mL urine + amphetamine and methylendioxiamphetamine deuterated internal standards + borate buffer [pH 9] + dichloromethane/isopropanol [85:15] in Bond Elut) and analyze the extracts by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC–NPD) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Neither urine contained amphetamine or amphetamine derivatives. However, both urines were found to contain chloroquine (213.29 mg/mL and 72 mg/mL) and its main metabolite, desethylchloroquine (56.50 mg/mL and 4.10 mg/mL).

We prepared urines spiked with different concentrations of chloroquine and tested them on the Hitachi 902 Automatic Analyzer using CEDIA Amphetamine reagent. We found that chloroquine was responsible for the positive results when at high concentrations. Table I shows the different concentrations of chloroquine assayed and its results as compared with the established cutoff for amphetamine reagent (500).

We could not prepare spiked urines with the metabolite because we did not have a reference standard (desethylchloroquine in the urines was calculated by GC–NPD using chloroquine as standard), but it is likely to give similar or more (considering its molecular formula) cross-reactivity than chloroquine itself. Thus, the positive result in urines is due to chloroquine, its metabolite desethylchloroquine, and probably some other minor metabolites. This could explain the result, in the assay, of the second urine in spite of its concentration of chloroquine (73 mg/mL) below 100 mg/mL.

Chloroquine is an antibacterial drug that is effective for the profilaxis of P. falciparum in some geographical areas (A zone of OMS classification) where the Plasmodium has not developed resistance. It is used in relatively high doses, thus making possible the elimination of high concentrations of the drug in urine.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

To order multiple copies click here.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.


| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |