Journal of Analytical Toxicology Article Abstracts

Journal of Analytical Toxicology Horizontal Line

Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Volume 23, Number 6, October 1999, pp.386-395

Measurement of Low Breath-Alcohol Concentrations: Laboratory Studies and Field Experience
Kurt M. Dubowski and Natalie A. Essary

Recent federal rules and traffic law changes impose breath-alcohol thresholds of 0.02 and 0.04 g/210 L upon some classes of motor vehicle operators, such as juveniles and commercial vehicle operators. In federally regulated alcohol testing in the workplace, removal of covered workers from safety-sensitive duties, and other adverse actions, also occur at breath-alcohol concentrations (BrACs) of 0.02 and 0.04 g/210 L. We therefore studied performance of vapor-alcohol and breath-alcohol measurement at low alcohol concentrations in the laboratory and in the field, with current-generation evidential analyzers. We report here chiefly our field experience with evidential breath-alcohol testing of drinking drivers on paired breath samples using 62 Intoxilyzer 5000-D analyzers, for BrACs of 0–0.059 g/210 L. The data from 62 law enforcement breath-alcohol testing sites were collected and pooled, with BrACs recorded to three decimal places, and otherwise carried out under the standard Oklahoma evidential breath-alcohol testing protocol. For 2105 pooled simulator control tests at 0.06–0.13 g/210 L the mean ± SD of the differences between target and result were –0.001 ± 0.0035 g/210 L and 0.003 ± 0.0023 g/210 L for signed and absolute differences, respectively (spans –0.016–0.010, 0.000–0.016). For 2078 paired duplicate breath-alcohol measurements with the Intoxilyzer 5000-D, the mean ± SD difference (BrAC 1 – BrAC 2) were 0.002 ± 0.0026 (span 0–0.020 g/210 L). Variability of breath-alcohol measurements was related inversely to the alcohol concentration. Ninety-nine percent prediction limits for paired BrAC measurements correspond to a 0.020 g/210 L maximum absolute difference, meeting the NSC/CAOD recommendation that paired breath-alcohol analysis results within 0.02 g/210 L shall be deemed to be in acceptable agreement. We conclude that the field system for breath-alcohol analysis studied by us can and does perform reliably and accurately at low BrACs.

Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.

This article is available in its entirety by fax for $40.00 each.
Visa, MasterCard and AMEX accepted.

To order electronically click here
or call: 847-647-2900 ext. 1323
or fax request to: 847-647-1155.

Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers.

 

| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications | Site Map |