![]()
![]()
Published: Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Volume 20, Number 4, July/August 1996, pp. 273.
| Letter to the Editor: |
Zopiclone Poisoning
D. Pounder and J. Davies
To the Editor:
Van Bocxlaer et al. (1) have described a case of poisoning by zopiclone, which
is a cyclopyrrolone, third-generation hypnotic. They found drug concentrations
of 0.15 mg/g in stomach contents, 5.10 µg/g in liver, and 1.18 µg/mL
in blood (sampling site unspecified). In a similar fatality case (2), we found
concentrations ranging from 0.9 to 2.0 µg/mL in ten distinct blood sampling
sites. After allowing the body to lie undisturbed for 40 h, we drew 15 additional
blood samples, which disclosed concentrations of 0.9 to 1.8 µg/mL. From
this we concluded that postmortem blood levels of zopiclone are relatively stable
and little influenced by postmortem drug redistribution (3), which is consistent
with the known low volume of distribution, approximately 1.5 L/kg (4). Both
bile and urine were available for analysis and contained zopiclone at concentrations
of 14.1 and 10.5 µg/mL, respectively. In solid organs, the highest drug
concentrations were found in the spleen (5.8 µg/g), but this may reflect
postmortem diffusion from gastric contents (55.1 µg/mL). Liver concentrations
measured up to 4.9 µg/g, but they were site-variable and ranged between
0.5 and 4.9 µg/g in eight samples. The highest concentrations were in
the left lobe, and the lowest concentrations were in the right lobe. This 10-fold
range in concentration of zopiclone in the liver most likely reflects postmortem
diffusion from the stomach and emphasizes the desirability of obtaining a liver
sample from deep within the right lobe (5). Consequently, the liver concentration
of zopiclone reported by Van Bocxlaer and co-workers should be viewed with caution.
After quantitating zopiclone in 21 solid organ samples, including fat and skeletal muscle, we calculated body load of the drug by adding the drug load of each major tissue or organ, which was calculated from the drug concentration and organ weight. By this method, the body load of zopiclone was estimated as 111 mg. For comparative purposes, body drug load, which was calculated by volume of distribution (Vd) (Vd = 1.5 L/kg; body weight = 64 kg; femoral venous blood concentration = 1.2 µg/mL), was 91 mg. Thus, it appears that calculation of the ingested dose of zopiclone by the Vd method is likely to be reasonably accurate, given that zopiclone does not show significant postmortem redistribution. This may prove to be of considerable assistance in the interpretation of zopiclone blood levels in fatalities.
Derrick Pounder and Justine Davies
Department of Forensic Medicine
University of Dundee
The Royal Infirmary
Dundee DD1 9ND
Scotland
References
The authors reply:
We fully agree with Pounder and Davies comments on the postmortem diffusion
of zopiclone from the stomach. This statement also holds true for several other
drugs. Consequently, in all autopsies carried out by our group, a specimen of
the right liver lobe is always taken in a standardized procedure for further
toxicological analysis.
The rather high concentration of zopiclone we found in that part of the liver (5.10 µg/g) could be a result of a longer death agony of the deceased, which would allow time for the liver zopiclone concentration to increase (1).
J. Van Bocxlaer1, E. Meyer1, K. Clauwaert1, W. Lambert1, M. Piette2, and A. De Leenheer1
1Laboratorium voor Toxicologie and 2 Universiteit Gent
B-9000 Gent
Belgium
Reference
Reproduction of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publishers permission.
| This article is available in its entirety by fax for $4.00 per page. Visa or MasterCard accepted. To order electronically click
here Please indicate JAT volume and issue along with page numbers. |
| Home | Subscribe | Current Issue | Back Issues | Search | Advertise | Other Publications |